Print View From: To: Date: Sunday - September 27, 2009 1:22 PM Subject: Snake Vally water I object to this agreement because it siphons water out of an aquifer that cannot easily be replenished. I also think it shortchanges Utah. Las Vegas should learn to live with the water it already has. It cannot continue to grow and irresponsibly continue taking other's water, including from other less populated areas in their own state. They are, after all, right in the middle of a hot, arid desert. Why should Utah be asked to sacrifice water to Las Vegas or to any other state? What in the world was Senator Bennet thinking by even entering into negotiations regarding Las Vegas siphoning water out of the Snake Valley aquifer??!! For those saying that if any unacceptable changes are observed, the draining of the aquifer would be stopped, by the time anyone observes/admits that unacceptable changes have taken place, it most likely will be too late to mitigate the damage. And I would like to know........once this aquifer is drained, much to the environment's detriment..........where will Las Vegas then go to obtain more and more water? They need to be stopped! Do not sign any agreement giving Las Vegas or any other entity the right to drain precious water that is mostly located in Utah! Please do not allow this!!! The water belongs right where it is.............for use in its own area, if it has to be used at all. Carol Stillman 797 E Rainforest Drive Murray, UT 84107