General Adjudication Information
About:
General Water Rights Adjudications are a critical piece of the statewide program to create and maintain a complete record of water rights. The water rights adjudication process helps to bring order and certainty to the water rights record throughout the state by defining existing rights, quantifying unknown rights, and removing unused and abandoned rights from the record through judicial decree. Under the direction of the district court, the State Engineer provides notice to all potential water right claimants to submit claims, publishes and files a List of Unclaimed Rights with the district court, evaluates filed water user's claims, prepares a hydrographic survey map, and then prepares and files a Proposed Determination of water rights in the district court. Water users have the opportunity to contest the List of Unclaimed Rights and the Proposed Determination by filing an objection with the district court. Objections must be resolved before the court can render a decree on either the List of Unclaimed Rights or the Proposed Determination.
All of the hydrologic areas within the State of Utah are currently involved in a court-ordered adjudication of water rights except the Weber River, Sevier River, and Green River drainages. The water rights on the Sevier and Weber Rivers were adjudicated and decreed in the 1920's and 1930's. The adjudications in most of the other areas of the state were started in the 1950's through the early 1970's.
Utah Code Title 73, Chapter 4 governs water right adjudications and defines the overall process. The following summary of the adjudication process is for convenience only and is not meant to represent the entirety of requirements, obligations, or limits of the statute. As such, it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional legal counsel or other competent advisers.
The water rights adjudication process is typically
initiated one of two ways. Water users may petition the State Engineer to file
an action in the respective district court to initiate an adjudication;
alternatively, a suit involving several water rights might be converted into a
general water rights adjudication by the court. This has already occurred
within each of the 15 major drainages in the State of Utah. (Utah Code 73-4-1)
The Division of Water Rights is committed to helping water users navigate the water rights adjudication process and is available for public inquiry and assistance.
Resources:
Listed below are Decrees covering waters in the State of Utah. Click on a decree name to view documents associated with the decree.
Decrees By County
Decrees By River System
- Utah Lake Jordan River Morse Decree (2861, 3449, 3459)
- Provo River Decree (2888 Civil) Court Exhibits
- Sevier River (Case 843) Court Exhibit
- Johnson Creek (85 Area) 1896 McCarty Decree
- Johnson Creek (85 Area) Chidister Decree
- Johnson Creek (85 Area) Bates Decree
- Weber/Ogden River Decrees (35 Area)
Decrees with Important Interpretive Impact on Utah Water Law
- Utah Supreme Court Decision 2013 UT 54 Delta Canal Co., Melville Irrigation Co., Abraham Irrigation Co., Deseret Irrigation Co., and Central Utah Water Co. Vs. Frank Vincent Family Ranch, LC. Of importance is paragraph 41 stating that the number of acres alone is not determinative in a forfeiture analysis, and acreages need not match values in a public decree or general adjudication when considering whether full beneficial use is being exhibited.
- Utah Supreme Court Decision 2011 UT 33 Big Ditch Irrigation Company Vs. Salt Lake City Corporation addresses that people who aren't the record water right owner are entitled to file a change application if they are "entitled to the use of water"
- Utah Supreme Court Decision 2011 UT 31 Jennifer Jean Jensen Executor And Personal Representative Of The Estate Of Marilyn Hamblin Vs. Kent Jones, Utah State Engineer addresses state engineer's authority to declare forfeiture of a water right as the basis for denying a change application.
- Utah Supreme Court Decision 2011 UT 27 Haik v Sandy City discusses the importance of recording water right deeds promptly and duty of purchasers to take notice of events around them and act in good faith in water right transactions.
- Utah Supreme Court Decision 2010 UT 37 Bingham v Roosevelt discusses a right to ground water levels and addresses standards of care under Utah concept of reasonable access to groundwater.
- Utah Supreme Court Decision 2009 UT 16 Otter Creek v New Escalante addresses water right adverse use claims and conditions under which they can be sustained.
- Utah Supreme Court Decision 2005 UT 64 Strawberry Water Users v USBR discusses jurisdication on water matters, who may file change applications, and provides glimpses of the court's views on reuse of both natural drainage and imported waters.
- Utah Supreme Court Decision 2005 UT 58 Searle v Milburn Irrigation defines extent of evidence requirements and burdens of proof for water right applications. Also provides a court opinion on duties of the applicant and state engineer prior to certificating a water right application
- Utah Supreme Court decision on Eskelsen v Town of Perry (1991) makes various comments concerning forfeiture, nonuse, and the perpetuation of a right through beneficial use; suggests a municipality does not silently convey its water rights by appurtenance in a land transfer; examines the burden of proof needed to establish the validity of a Diligence Claim and discusses the differences in standing of a Diligence Claim versus a Statement of Water User's Claim.
- Utah Supreme Court decision on Bonham v Morgan (1989) defines duties of the state engineer in approving applications, specifically change applications and considering public welfare issues.
- Utah Supreme Court decision on Wayman v Murray City (1969) discusses public policy on water development, difficulties in regulation of underground waters, replacement of underground water, appropriators right to pressure head, and doctrine of reasonable use and impairment.
The Special Master is a Court-appointed official who presides over objection proceedings within the Utah Lake & Jordan River (ULJR) General Adjudication (Civil No. 360057298). On June 28, 2016, the 3rd District Court appointed Mr. Rick L. Knuth as the Special Master for the ULJR General Adjudication in order to facilitate the resolution of objections to a Proposed Determination or a List of Unclaimed Rights.
Special Master's Duties
The scope of the Special Master's duties is governed by the Order of Reference issued by the Court. His duties include:- Actively managing objections by scheduling proceedings, notifying parties, holding status and settlement conferences, and holding hearings.
- Identifying affected parties to the objections.
- Taking evidence, overseeing discovery, ruling on procedural and substantive motions.
- Preparing a report and recommendation for each objection that contains his findings, conclusions, and recommendation.
Process Overview – Objections filed prior to June 28, 2016
- The State Engineer provides a service matrix to the Special Master that identifies the original objector and potential successors in interest to the objection.
- The Special Master sends “Notice and Order to Show Cause” to the objector (and potential successors) that indicates that they must file their “Notice of Intent to Proceed” with the Court within 35 days or risk having the Special Master recommend that the objection be dismissed.
- If an objector files a Notice of Intent to Proceed, the State Engineer will file an answer and identify any parties who might potentially be affected by the objection proceeding.
- Objectors are also required to disclose any parties who might potentially be affected by the objection proceeding.
- The Special Master sends a Notice of Objection Proceeding to the affected parties.
- Affected parties may choose to actively participate in the litigation once notified.
- Once the State Engineer has filed an answer and the potentially affected parties have been disclosed, the Special Master sets a scheduling conference that will govern further litigation of the objection proceeding.
- Upon conclusion of litigation (or settlement negotiations), the Special Master files a report and recommendation to the Court that outlines his findings, conclusions, and recommendation. Parties have 30 days to file an objection to the Special Master's report and recommendation before the Court makes a decision and dismisses the objection.
Process Overview – Objections filed subsequent to June 28, 2016
- Following an objection to a Proposed Determination, the Special Master sends three things to the Objector: (1)
a copy of Standing Order No. 3; (2) a copy of the Court's Amended Order Appointing a Master and Order of Reference;
and (3) an explanatory cover letter.
- The State Engineer files an Answer and identifies any parties who are potentially affected by the Objection proceeding.
- Within 14 days of the State Engineer's Answer and disclosure, the Objector must file a disclosure identifying any additional potentially affected parties.
- The Special Master sends a Notice of Objection Proceeding and Opportunity to be Heard to all potentially affected parties.
- Potentially affected parties have 49 days to file a notice with the Court indicating that they intend to participate in the Objection proceeding.
- After filing a notice indicating their intent to participate, affected parties have 35 days to file a pleading in response to the Objection, which sets forth the party's claims and defenses.
- The Special Master holds a scheduling conference after notifying all parties of the date, time, and location of the conference.
- The Special Master issues a Scheduling Order, which contains deadlines for discovery, settlement negotiations, dispositive motions, etc.
- Upon conclusion of litigation (or settlement negotiations), the Special Master files a Report and Recommendation with the Court that outlines his findings, conclusions, and recommendation. Parties have 30 days to file an objection to the Report and Recommendation before the Court makes a final decision.
Disclaimer: The information provided above is for informational purposes only and not to be used as a substitute for consultation with professional legal counsel.
Additional Resources:
A motion to appoint R.L. Knuth as Special Master pursuant to Utah Rule of Civil Procedure 53 has been filed in the case entitled IN THE MATTER OF THE GENERAL DETERMINATION OF RIGHTS TO THE USE OF WATER, BOTH SURFACE AND UNDERGROUND, WITHIN THE DRAINAGE AREA OF THE VIRGIN RIVER IN WASHINGTON, IRON, AND KANE COUNTIES IN UTAH. This action is pending in the Fifth Judicial District in and for Washington County, State of Utah, Civil No. 800507596. The Division of Water Rights, also known as the Office of the State Engineer, has filed a motion to appoint R.L. Knuth as Special Master pursuant to Utah Rule of Civil Procedure 53. Parties may obtain a copy of the motion and associated documents at https://waterrights.utah.gov/adjdinfo/default.asp, or on file with the Fifth District Court. A party may object to the appointment of any person as a master on the same grounds as a party may challenge for cause any prospective trial juror in the trial of a civil action. Utah Rule of Civil Procedure 53(f). Such objections are due within 30 days of the final date of publication of this notice. Replies to opposing memoranda are due within 30 days of the final date for filing opposing memoranda. The Court has set a hearing on the motion on November 18, 2019 at 2:00 p.m. located at 206 West Tabernacle, St. George, Utah. For more information, please contact the Utah Division of Water Rights at (801) 538-7240 or the Attorney General's Office at (801) 538-7227.